This project failed for technical reaasons: We need to go through all intermediary versions when doing a package upgrade, to run all migration functions. So, I had the idea to update the remote repo on Git commits. But the binaries for the production and localhost tests may be different, this makes it nearly impossible to do correctly. If you have an idea how to save my project, please I to hear you.
Here’s an analysis of how a decentralized package manager, such as IC Pack, addresses issues related to control, security, and efficiency in software management:
The Core Problem: Traditional software management approaches often force users to choose between the control of locally installed software and the convenience of SaaS. Locally installed software requires high Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), has limited interoperability, and can be unreliable, while SaaS can take control away from the user by updating apps without consent and having risks such as bankruptcy.
Decentralized Package Managers as a Solution: Decentralized package managers, like IC Pack, aim to solve this dilemma by merging the benefits of both approaches. These systems allow users to install software in the ICP blockchain and use it in a user’s subnet.
- User Control and Sovereignty:
- Full control over apps: Unlike SaaS, where updates can occur without user consent, decentralized package managers ensure that only the user can update their software. This is a key feature that gives the user more control.
- Self-sovereignty: This approach returns control to the user, making them “self-sovereign,” a key concept in blockchain.
- No Forced Updates: No developer or DAO can push harmful updates without the user’s consent.
- Enhanced Security:
- Permission Control: Users can manage which software can communicate with each other, preventing deadlocks caused by malfunctioning apps. This permission control isn’t typically found in traditional SaaS.
- Secure Installation: These systems act as a secure installer, ensuring that only verified software installation packages are used.
- Reduced Single Point of Failure: The decentralized nature of these package management systems reduces the risk of a single point of failure.
- Performance and Efficiency:
- Faster Interoperability: By placing all interoperable software in the same subnet, users experience significantly faster performance compared to traditional blockchain apps. This is an improvement over slow blockchain interoperability.
- Efficient Resource Use: Concepts such as the “virtual canister” (although not yet in use in IC Pack) aim to offer different performance parameters and cost efficiency.
- Lower TCO: Decentralized package managers offer lower Total Cost of Ownership than locally installed software.
- Flexibility and Choice:
- Software Selection: Users have the freedom to choose which software to install. This allows users to select from various software tools and user software, tailoring their environment to specific needs.
- Multiple Repositories: Unlike some traditional systems, users can install software from multiple repositories, offering a range of choices. For example, they can choose between different email clients.
- Decentralization and Reliability:
- Reduced Reliance on Central Entities: The decentralized nature of these systems reduces reliance on single providers. This makes the systems more resilient and ensures better availability than SaaS.
IC Pack as an Example: IC Pack is a package manager designed for the ICP blockchain that embodies these principles. It is designed to be similar to Google Play or Linux package managers.
- Direct Installation: It allows users to install copies of IC software directly into their own subnet, ensuring full control.
- User-Friendly Interface: It aims for ease of management, similar to app stores.
- Unique Approach: It is the first package manager for fully on-chain applications.
Practical Implications for Developers and Users:
- For Developers: They can publish software with the assurance that users maintain full control. They can also distribute software without being centrally controlled.
- For End Users: Users gain control over their digital environment, benefit from enhanced performance and cost savings. They have greater control over their software, as if installed on computer.
Market Opportunity: The potential market for paid apps is substantial, with projections of $673.80 billion by 2027. If a decentralized package manager were to charge a 10% tax, the Total Addressable Market (TAM) could reach $67.38 billion by 2027.
In summary, decentralized package managers represent a significant shift in software management by offering a hybrid approach that combines user control with convenience, security, and efficiency. They provide a compelling alternative to traditional software models for the installation of software in computer.